English

Share with friends

Note

Regarding infrastructure automation, Ansible, and Terraform emerge as leading tools. With its distinct features, Ansible shines in configuration management and orchestration.

Know the Differences between Ansible and Terraform cover image

At the same time, Terraform excels in infrastructure provisioning. This blog will explore the key differences between Ansible and Terraform to help you choose the best fit for your organization.

To streamline and simplify infrastructure, both Ansible and Terraform play pivotal roles.

Ansible is a versatile configuration management and orchestration tool that allows users effortlessly handle software setups and server configurations.

Terraform focuses on infrastructure provisioning, enabling users to seamlessly build and manage cloud resources.

This blog will thoroughly discover these two tools, equipping you with the knowledge to decide which tool aligns with your automation goals.

So, let's get started. But first, let's look at Configuration Management vs Orchestration.

Configuration Management vs. Orchestration

Configuration management and orchestration go hand in hand, working as a dynamic duo in automation. Both are vital in offering user coordination to ensure everything comes together seamlessly.

Configuration management is like a personal assistant that helps maintain consistency and manage software configurations across multiple servers.

It ensures everything runs smoothly, seamlessly, and in perfect order.

On the other hand, orchestration takes a broader perspective and helps users have a delightful experience. It takes charge of coordinating and sequencing diverse tasks and workflows.

This is all done by leveraging tools like workflow engines and job schedulers to optimize resource allocation, parallel execution, and error handling.

Similarities between Ansible and Terraform

Ansible and Terraforms have some remarkable similarities; let's look at a few of them.

  • Since both of them holds a high level of functionality, they offer a seamless configuration of cloud infrastructure and their applications.

  • The masterless architecture of these helps eliminate the need for separate infrastructure management. Moreover, they also enable nature to enable remote execution of commands on newly provisioned virtual machines.

  • Ansible and Terraform provide integration capabilities with cloud providers through their respective APIs. This allows users to have the power of the cloud and leverage the rich feature sets offered by popular vendors.

What is Ansible vs Terraform?

Ansible is an open-source automation tool that focuses on configuration management and orchestration. It enables users to define and manage the desired state of systems, ensuring consistency across multiple servers and configurations.

Ansible uses a simple YAML-based language to describe tasks, making it easy to learn and understand. It operates over SSH or PowerShell, allowing for agentless and secure remote execution of commands.

Terraform is an open-source infrastructure provisioning tool that enables users to define and manage cloud resources using declarative configuration files.

It provides a platform-agnostic approach, allowing infrastructure provisioned across various cloud providers, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.

Also Read: How to Migrate from AWS to Azure?

Terraform vs Ansible for Network Automation

Terraforms excels in infrastructure provisioning and management. It allows the users to define network configurations as code and provision network resources across multiple cloud providers.

Its declarative language allows users to create and manage network topologies and establish connectivity efficiently.

Whereas Ansible shines in configuration management and orchestration. This makes it a versatile tool.

While it may not focus solely on infrastructure provisioning like Terraform, Ansible offers extensive network modules and flexibility for configuring and managing network devices in various environments.

Terraform vs Ansible for Provisioning

Terraform offers great infrastructure provisioning by providing a program-agnostic solution that enables users to define and manage cloud resources using declarative configuration files.

Terraform supports multiple cloud providers. That makes it easier to have consistent and scalable provisioning of virtual machines, networks, storage, and more.

Whereas Ansible is not primarily focused on provisioning like Terraform, it can still be used effectively for provisioning tasks.

Its configuration management orchestration capabilities allow users to define and enforce the desired state of systems, making it suitable for provisioning and configuring software and server setups.

Also Read: A Complete List of Terraform Commands

Ansible vs Terraform for State Management

Since Ansible is a configuration management and orchestration tool, it manages the state implicitly.

It operates in a stateless manner, where it executes tasks directly on target systems without maintaining a separate state file.

Ansible uses modules to bring systems to the desired state based on the playbook instructions provided. This makes Ansible well-suited for ad-hoc changes and real-time configuration management.

On the other hand, Terraform explicitly manages state through state files. When provisioning and managing infrastructure, Terraform tracks the current state of resources and stores it in a state file.

This file allows Terraform to understand the desired state and apply changes accordingly, ensuring consistency and enabling the detection of drifts.

Also Read: Best Practices for CI/CD

Terraform vs Ansible: Mutable vs Immutable

Terraform follows an immutable infrastructure approach. It treats infrastructure as code and provisions resources from scratch with each deployment.

Terraform allows you to define the desired state of your infrastructure using declarative configuration files. It provisions new resources or updates existing ones to match the desired state, promoting consistency and eliminating configuration drift.

On the other hand, Ansible embraces a mutable infrastructure philosophy. It focuses on configuring and managing existing infrastructure in real time.

Ansible allows you to perform targeted configuration changes on individual systems, making it suitable for ad-hoc and ongoing configuration management tasks.

It provides flexibility for making in-place system modifications, which can be beneficial in certain scenarios requiring frequent and incremental changes.

Also Read: What is Helm in DevOps?

Terraform vs Ansible: Declarative vs Procedural

Terraform follows a declarative approach to automation. With Terraform, you define the desired state of your infrastructure using configuration files.

The focus is on describing what you want your infrastructure to look like, and Terraform takes care of provisioning and managing the resources to achieve that state.

This declarative approach allows for infrastructure as code, promoting consistency and enabling easy reproducibility.

In contrast, Ansible takes a procedural approach to automation. With Ansible, you define a sequence of tasks and actions to be executed procedurally.

It allows for fine-grained control over individual steps and supports conditional logic, loops, and other programming constructs.

Ansible's procedural nature makes it flexible for performing configuration management tasks, executing commands, and managing systems in real-time.

Terraform vs Ansible: Which One Should You Choose?

When choosing between Terraform and Ansible, there are a few key factors to consider that can help you make an informed decision.

Infrastructure Provisioning

Terraform provides a platform-agnostic solution if your primary focus is on infrastructure provisioning and managing cloud resources.

It allows you to define infrastructure as code and provision resources across multiple cloud providers.

Configuration Management and Orchestration

If your automation needs involve configuration management, server orchestration, and managing existing infrastructure, Ansible is a versatile choice.

It offers extensive modules and flexibility for configuring systems and managing complex workflows.

Declarative vs. Procedural

Consider whether you prefer a declarative or procedural approach to automation.

Terraform takes a declarative approach, defining the desired state and handling the provisioning and management.

Ansible follows a procedural approach, allowing for fine-grained control and real-time configuration changes.

Infrastructure Complexity

Evaluate the complexity of your infrastructure. Terraform excels in managing complex infrastructures with its infrastructure-as-code approach, while Ansible offers flexibility for managing diverse systems and environments.

Collaboration and Community

Assess your desired level of collaboration and community support. Terraform and Ansible have active and vibrant communities, providing resources, modules, and support.

Consider factors such as community size, documentation, and available integrations.

Summary of Differences between Terraform vs Ansible

The choice between Terraform and Ansible depends on your specific automation needs and preferences. Consider the scope and requirements of your projects, your infrastructure setup, and the automation capabilities that align with your workflow.

In some cases, combining both tools may be optimal, leveraging each tool's strengths for different aspects of your automation tasks.

ParameterTerraformAnsible
DefinitionEnables users to define and manage the desired state of systems, ensuring consistency across multiple servers and configurationsEnables users to define and manage cloud resources using declarative configuration files
Network AutomationAllows users to define network configurations as code and provision network resources across multiple cloud providersOffers extensive network modules and flexibility for configuring and managing network devices in various environments
Infrastructure ProvisioningOffers great infrastructure provisioning by providing a program-agnostic solution that enables users to define and manage cloud resources using declarative configuration filesCan still be used effectively for provisioning tasks
State ManagementExplicitly manages state through state filesOperates in a stateless manner, where it executes tasks directly on target systems without maintaining a separate state file
ApproachImmutableMutable
Automation ApproachDeclarativeProcedural

Share with friends

Priyansh Khodiyar's profile

Written by Priyansh Khodiyar

Priyansh is the founder of UnYAML and a software engineer with a passion for writing. He has good experience with writing and working around DevOps tools and technologies, APMs, Kubernetes APIs, etc and loves to share his knowledge with others.

Further Reading

Life is better with cookies 🍪

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Cookie Policy